Wanda
Rushing wrote an article entitled “School Segregation and Its Discontents:
Chaos and Community in Post-Civil Rights Memphis”. It focuses on the merger of Memphis and
Shelby County schools that occurred between 2010 and 2013, and argues that this
“reveals a great deal about processes that sustain patterns of inequality”(Rushing,
2017, p.13). This analysis was based on a qualitative case study that
interviewed a population of community leaders who had experienced the “civil
rights era” and those born after, and also reviewed census and newspaper documents
and statements given in public forums. Our class has begun to consider the reality
and implications of legally sanctioned segregation in the early civil rights
movement, and this article exemplifies the continuing impact of this history. This
article provides an in-depth look at the circumstances and responses of this
merger and how it relates to the realities of school segregation in the 21st
century.
Since Brown v. Board of Education,
the body of literature that analyzed segregation in schools has focused
primarily on segregation among schools in the same district. Much of this
research, and the desegregation policies that stemmed from it, has ignored the
overwhelming demographic differences between school districts in the same
metropolitan area. Rushing believes that between school district segregation is
the largest contributing factor to the persistence of education inequality
based on race. Between 1970 and 2000 within-school district segregation
declined, while between-school district segregation increased. Rushing also
notes a trend toward the creation of multiple smaller municipal districts and
how this “increases metropolitan fragmentation, exacerbating segregation and
inequality between districts, particularly between urban and suburban ones” (Rushing,
2017, p. 6). This trend was evident in the years following the Memphis and
Shelby County school merger when many Memphis suburbs, including Germantown,
Collierville, and Arlington, established their own school districts with
noticeably all-white school boards.
Rushing’s
theoretical background defines segregation as a system that encourages
unequal categorical distinctions, such as city-county or black-white. Rushing’s
analysis concludes that “efforts to maintain social, political, and educational
boundaries between these unequal categories relied on old symbols, images, and
ideologies of individualism, competition, and local autonomy to reinforce the
status quo” (Rushing, 2017, p. 26). In multiple interviews, the interviewee’s
perspective of the success or failure of previous desegregation efforts, such
as busing, was utilized as a tool to support their position on the current
issue. The excerpts Rushing provides of the interviews taken for this project
show the extent to which history shapes our understanding of the present.
Rushing, W.
(2017). School Segregation and its Discontents: Chaos and Community in
Post-Civil Rights Memphis. Urban
Education, 52(1), 3-31.
I attended Arlington High School during the time of the merger/demerger and I honestly did not know much about it; I was just worried about whether or not it would easier or harder to get snow days. However, now that I have done more research on it, I clearly see how the creation of the individual school districts really only allows these school districts to maintain their status of being wealthy and white. I also remember how some of my friends who were not zoned for Arlington left due to inability to ride the school bus because it did not go out to their area. These small things that I did not think of at the time have such apparent racist implications and only allows these school districts to keep students of color out of their schools.
ReplyDelete