Friday, April 27, 2018

Shifting Historical Perspectives through Statue Removal


Although we weren’t able to fully discuss the statue removals in Memphis, I wanted to draw some attention to an important statue removal that happened last week in New York City. The statue was of J. Marion Sims, an incredibly influential figure in the field of gynecology. The statue was removed from Central Park after the Public Design Commission and the mayor’s office unanimously voted to relocate the statue to Sims’ gravesite in Brooklyn. Sims’ important work and contributions to gynecology are problematic because they were discovered through inhumane experimentation on enslaved black women. The article about the statue removal frequently quotes from Sims’ journals and experimental records. Sims experiments were conducted without anesthesia and he repeatedly performed surgery again and again on the same subjects as soon as they had partially healed from the previous attempt. The techniques acquired from this research where later implemented on white women (with anesthesia). The article also connects Sims work to the unequal treatment of black patients today, quoting the research of another NPR program, Hidden Brain, "Black patients continue to receive less pain medication for broken bones and cancer. Black children receive less pain medication that white children for appendicitis. One reason for this is that many people inaccurately believe that blacks literally have thicker skin than whites and experience less pain." [1] This discriminatory treatment highlights the way historical stereotypes have real-life effects on the wellbeing of marginalized groups.

NYC is replacing the statue with another monument. One of the proposed replacements is a monument towards women of color in science. It is important to note that the commission also suggested the ‘re-contextualization’ of other controversial monuments with more accurate and complete plaques describing the history of the monument or statue’s subject. [2]  This removal provides a model for future changes to historical monuments that represent racist ideology.

There are 800 other monuments considered for removal by the commission. Should Memphis consider removing other public monuments or, given the severe reaction to the previous statue removals here, should Memphis take on more of a re-contextualization stance and replace plaques at remaining controversial monuments?



[1] Camila Domonoske, “‘Father Of Gynecology,’ Who Experimented On Slaves, No Longer On Pedestal In NYC” (NPR, April 17, 2018).
[2] Domonoske.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Busing

Education is a key policy to any functioning community.  It provides the tools necessary fro achievement and success.  It also divides us an...